Triple

T22196852
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject WebAssembly.Instance E548571 entity
Predicate exportsContains P11236 FINISHED
Object exported WebAssembly functions LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: exported WebAssembly functions | Statement: [WebAssembly.Instance, exportsContains, exported WebAssembly functions]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: exportsContains
Context triple: [WebAssembly.Instance, exportsContains, exported WebAssembly functions]
  • A. currentContains
    Indicates that one entity presently includes, encloses, or has another entity within its bounds or scope.
  • B. alsoContains
    Indicates that something includes, in addition to its primary contents, another specified element or component.
  • C. includesElement chosen
    Indicates that one collection, set, or structure contains a specified element as a member or component.
  • D. containsTest
    Indicates that one entity includes or encompasses another entity as a test or testing component.
  • E. typicallyContain
    Indicates that one entity is normally or commonly found within, included in, or held by another entity under usual circumstances.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e11e3ecc7c8190b5f94cd8f42e9d37 completed April 16, 2026, 5:37 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f12ae7c72081909b7817d66391bef4 completed April 28, 2026, 9:47 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e71b48576c8190a8e93738fd9cfda5 completed April 21, 2026, 6:38 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:35 p.m.