Triple

T22162127
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Hindu Widows’ Remarriage Act, 1856 E547696 entity
Predicate consequenceOfRemarriage P147215 FINISHED
Object widow lost rights to deceased husband’s property LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: widow lost rights to deceased husband’s property | Statement: [Hindu Widows’ Remarriage Act, 1856, consequenceOfRemarriage, widow lost rights to deceased husband’s property]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: consequenceOfRemarriage
Context triple: [Hindu Widows’ Remarriage Act, 1856, consequenceOfRemarriage, widow lost rights to deceased husband’s property]
  • A. remarriageTo
    Indicates that one entity has entered into a subsequent marriage with another entity after a prior marriage has ended.
  • B. remarriageToSameSpouse
    Indicates that an individual has legally remarried a person who was previously their spouse.
  • C. subsequentSpouse
    Indicates that one person is a later spouse of another, following a previous marriage involving at least one of them.
  • D. refusedRemarriageTo
    Indicates that one entity declined or rejected entering into a subsequent marriage with another entity.
  • E. remarriageStart
    Indicates the point in time when a new marriage begins following the end of a previous marriage.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e11e3c4c5c81908d336165816b12e0 completed April 16, 2026, 5:37 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f12a2e47a88190a3b5c05398605f68 completed April 28, 2026, 9:44 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e71b41555881909b8e22718974d527 completed April 21, 2026, 6:37 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69e7222d208c819098b12c13e31af629 completed April 21, 2026, 7:07 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:34 p.m.