Triple

T22147263
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Minerva Mills Ltd. v. Union of India E547317 entity
Predicate constitutionalAmendmentChallenged P35321 FINISHED
Object Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976 NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (3 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976 | Statement: [Minerva Mills Ltd. v. Union of India, constitutionalAmendmentChallenged, Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976
Context triple: [Minerva Mills Ltd. v. Union of India, constitutionalAmendmentChallenged, Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976]
  • A. Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976 chosen
    The Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976 is a major and controversial amendment to the Indian Constitution enacted during the Emergency, known for significantly expanding central government powers and curtailing the jurisdiction of the judiciary.
  • B. Constitution (Forty-third Amendment) Act, 1977
    The Constitution (Forty-third Amendment) Act, 1977 is an Indian constitutional amendment passed after the Emergency to roll back several provisions of the 42nd Amendment and restore aspects of judicial review and federal balance.
  • C. Constitution (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978
    The Constitution (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978 is an amendment to the Constitution of India enacted to restore and strengthen democratic freedoms and judicial safeguards that had been curtailed during the Emergency period.
  • D. 39th Constitutional Amendment of India
    The 39th Constitutional Amendment of India was a 1975 amendment passed during the Emergency that sought to place the election of the Prime Minister and other high officials beyond judicial scrutiny, widely seen as a move to protect Indira Gandhi’s contested election.
  • E. 74th Constitutional Amendment Act of India
    The 74th Constitutional Amendment Act of India is a landmark 1992 amendment that granted constitutional status to urban local bodies, strengthening municipal governance and promoting decentralization and local self-government in cities and towns.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: constitutionalAmendmentChallenged
Context triple: [Minerva Mills Ltd. v. Union of India, constitutionalAmendmentChallenged, Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976]
  • A. constitutionalChallenge
    Indicates a legal action or argument asserting that a law, policy, or governmental act violates a constitution and should be reviewed or invalidated.
  • B. constitutionalAmendmentInvolved chosen
    Indicates that a specific constitutional amendment is directly relevant to, affects, or is implicated in the described situation, case, or action.
  • C. canAmendConstitution
    Indicates that an entity has the authority or power to modify or revise a constitution.
  • D. challengedStatute
    Indicates that a particular statute or law is being contested, questioned, or disputed, typically in a legal or constitutional proceeding.
  • E. constitutionalArticleAffected
    Indicates that a specific constitutional article is impacted, modified, or otherwise influenced by an action, event, or legal measure.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e11e3a95d88190a3bd80d9471976c3 completed April 16, 2026, 5:36 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f129f156988190bc9a24a37418e849 completed April 28, 2026, 9:43 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e71b384e008190b723c9a0f1089d66 completed April 21, 2026, 6:37 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:33 p.m.