Triple
T22147263
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Minerva Mills Ltd. v. Union of India |
E547317
|
entity |
| Predicate | constitutionalAmendmentChallenged |
P35321
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976 |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976 | Statement: [Minerva Mills Ltd. v. Union of India, constitutionalAmendmentChallenged, Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976 Context triple: [Minerva Mills Ltd. v. Union of India, constitutionalAmendmentChallenged, Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976]
-
A.
Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976
chosen
The Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976 is a major and controversial amendment to the Indian Constitution enacted during the Emergency, known for significantly expanding central government powers and curtailing the jurisdiction of the judiciary.
-
B.
Constitution (Forty-third Amendment) Act, 1977
The Constitution (Forty-third Amendment) Act, 1977 is an Indian constitutional amendment passed after the Emergency to roll back several provisions of the 42nd Amendment and restore aspects of judicial review and federal balance.
-
C.
Constitution (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978
The Constitution (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978 is an amendment to the Constitution of India enacted to restore and strengthen democratic freedoms and judicial safeguards that had been curtailed during the Emergency period.
-
D.
39th Constitutional Amendment of India
The 39th Constitutional Amendment of India was a 1975 amendment passed during the Emergency that sought to place the election of the Prime Minister and other high officials beyond judicial scrutiny, widely seen as a move to protect Indira Gandhi’s contested election.
-
E.
74th Constitutional Amendment Act of India
The 74th Constitutional Amendment Act of India is a landmark 1992 amendment that granted constitutional status to urban local bodies, strengthening municipal governance and promoting decentralization and local self-government in cities and towns.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: constitutionalAmendmentChallenged Context triple: [Minerva Mills Ltd. v. Union of India, constitutionalAmendmentChallenged, Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976]
-
A.
constitutionalChallenge
Indicates a legal action or argument asserting that a law, policy, or governmental act violates a constitution and should be reviewed or invalidated.
-
B.
constitutionalAmendmentInvolved
chosen
Indicates that a specific constitutional amendment is directly relevant to, affects, or is implicated in the described situation, case, or action.
-
C.
canAmendConstitution
Indicates that an entity has the authority or power to modify or revise a constitution.
-
D.
challengedStatute
Indicates that a particular statute or law is being contested, questioned, or disputed, typically in a legal or constitutional proceeding.
-
E.
constitutionalArticleAffected
Indicates that a specific constitutional article is impacted, modified, or otherwise influenced by an action, event, or legal measure.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e11e3a95d88190a3bd80d9471976c3 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 5:36 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f129f156988190bc9a24a37418e849 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 9:43 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e71b384e008190b723c9a0f1089d66 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 6:37 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:33 p.m.