Triple

T22147229
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Minerva Mills Ltd. v. Union of India E547317 entity
Predicate fullCaseName P3131 FINISHED
Object Minerva Mills Ltd. and Others v. Union of India and Others — NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Minerva Mills Ltd. and Others v. Union of India and Others | Statement: [Minerva Mills Ltd. v. Union of India, fullCaseName, Minerva Mills Ltd. and Others v. Union of India and Others]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Minerva Mills Ltd. and Others v. Union of India and Others
Context triple: [Minerva Mills Ltd. v. Union of India, fullCaseName, Minerva Mills Ltd. and Others v. Union of India and Others]
  • A. Minerva Mills Ltd. v. Union of India chosen
    Minerva Mills Ltd. v. Union of India is a landmark 1980 judgment of the Supreme Court of India that reaffirmed and strengthened the basic structure doctrine by limiting Parliament’s power to amend the Constitution.
  • B. Waman Rao v. Union of India
    Waman Rao v. Union of India is a landmark 1981 Supreme Court of India judgment that reaffirmed and clarified the basic structure doctrine by upholding its applicability to constitutional amendments made after the Kesavananda Bharati decision.
  • C. S. S. Dhanoa v. Union of India
    S. S. Dhanoa v. Union of India is a Supreme Court of India judgment that examined the constitutional status, powers, and independence of the Election Commission and its officers in the context of electoral administration.
  • D. Sowmithri Vishnu v. Union of India
    Sowmithri Vishnu v. Union of India was a Supreme Court of India decision that had upheld the constitutionality of the adultery offence under Section 497 of the Indian Penal Code before it was later invalidated.
  • E. M. P. Sharma v. Satish Chandra
    M. P. Sharma v. Satish Chandra is a 1954 Supreme Court of India judgment that had denied the existence of a fundamental right to privacy under the Indian Constitution, a position later overruled by the landmark Puttaswamy decision.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e11e3a95d88190a3bd80d9471976c3 completed April 16, 2026, 5:36 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f129f156988190bc9a24a37418e849 completed April 28, 2026, 9:43 p.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:33 p.m.