Triple
T22140657
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Edmund Barton |
E547146
|
entity |
| Predicate | startTimeOfPosition: Justice of the High Court of Australia |
P147135
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 1903-10-05 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 1903-10-05 | Statement: [Edmund Barton, startTimeOfPosition: Justice of the High Court of Australia, 1903-10-05]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: startTimeOfPosition: Justice of the High Court of Australia Context triple: [Edmund Barton, startTimeOfPosition: Justice of the High Court of Australia, 1903-10-05]
-
A.
startTimeForPosition_AssociateJustice
Indicates the date and time at which an individual begins serving in the role of Associate Justice.
-
B.
endTimeForPosition_AssociateJustice
Indicates the time at which an individual's tenure in the position of Associate Justice concludes.
-
C.
appointedLordJusticeOfAppealYear
Indicates the year in which a person was appointed to the position of Lord Justice of Appeal.
-
D.
highCourtBench
Indicates that a particular bench or panel of judges belongs to, or is constituted within, a high court.
-
E.
associateJustice
Indicates that an entity serves in the role of an associate justice in relation to a specific court or judicial body.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e11e3a95d88190a3bd80d9471976c3 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 5:36 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f129bda1208190b851ae5c68b760e9 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 9:42 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e71b384e008190b723c9a0f1089d66 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 6:37 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e7222d208c819098b12c13e31af629 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 7:07 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:32 p.m.