Triple
T22118421
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Non-constituency Member of Parliament scheme |
E546598
|
entity |
| Predicate | supportArgument |
P2397
|
FINISHED |
| Object | allows alternative voices in Parliament even when opposition fails to win many seats |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: allows alternative voices in Parliament even when opposition fails to win many seats | Statement: [Non-constituency Member of Parliament scheme, supportArgument, allows alternative voices in Parliament even when opposition fails to win many seats]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supportArgument Context triple: [Non-constituency Member of Parliament scheme, supportArgument, allows alternative voices in Parliament even when opposition fails to win many seats]
-
A.
supportAgainst
Indicates providing help, resources, or advocacy to oppose or resist a particular target, threat, or adversary.
-
B.
support
Indicates that one entity provides assistance, endorsement, or backing to another entity or its actions.
-
C.
supportsProsecutionIn
Indicates that an entity provides assistance or backing to the prosecution side within a specified legal case or jurisdiction.
-
D.
supportsTheory
Indicates that one entity provides evidence, justification, or endorsement for the validity or acceptance of another entity’s theory.
-
E.
arguesThat
chosen
Indicates that one entity presents reasons or justification in support of a specific claim, position, or proposition held about another entity or topic.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e11e38b3848190ac3a4fa97d56e65a |
completed | April 16, 2026, 5:36 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1294fcf2c81909b610e03a0f1921f |
completed | April 28, 2026, 9:40 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e71b2ed7348190b6fa2e52f54393fb |
completed | April 21, 2026, 6:37 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:31 p.m.