Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Rayleigh–Sommerfeld first formula | Statement: [Rayleigh–Sommerfeld diffraction theory, hasFormulation, Rayleigh–Sommerfeld first formula]

Target entity: Rayleigh–Sommerfeld first formula
Context triple: [Rayleigh–Sommerfeld diffraction theory, hasFormulation, Rayleigh–Sommerfeld first formula]

• A. Rayleigh–Sommerfeld diffraction theory chosen
  Rayleigh–Sommerfeld diffraction theory is a more rigorous scalar diffraction formulation that corrects limitations in Kirchhoff’s approach by using boundary conditions consistent with the wave equation.
• B. Kirchhoff diffraction theory
  Kirchhoff diffraction theory is a classical wave optics framework that models light propagation and diffraction by treating wavefronts as superpositions of secondary spherical waves emitted from an aperture.
• C. Fresnel diffraction theory
  Fresnel diffraction theory is a wave-optics framework that describes how light diffracts when source or observation distances are finite, using near-field approximations derived from the Huygens–Fresnel principle.
• D. Huygens–Fresnel principle
  The Huygens–Fresnel principle is a fundamental concept in wave optics that explains how every point on a wavefront acts as a source of secondary wavelets whose interference determines the wave’s subsequent propagation and diffraction.
• E. Fraunhofer diffraction
  Fraunhofer diffraction is the far-field diffraction pattern of waves, typically light, observed when both the source and observation screen are effectively at infinite distance or made so with lenses, producing characteristic interference patterns.
• F. None of above.
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.