Triple
T22077262
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Electronic Voting Machines |
E545553
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | voting technology |
C30913
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: voting technology Context triple: [Electronic Voting Machines, instanceOf, voting technology]
-
A.
election technology
chosen
Election technology encompasses the digital and mechanical systems, tools, and processes used to support, conduct, secure, and verify elections, including voter registration, ballot casting, counting, and result reporting.
-
B.
cryptographic voting system
A cryptographic voting system is a secure, privacy-preserving election mechanism that uses cryptographic protocols to ensure ballot secrecy, voter authentication, integrity of tallies, and verifiable results without revealing individual votes.
-
C.
end-to-end auditable voting scheme
An end-to-end auditable voting scheme is a voting system that allows each voter and independent observers to verify, from ballot casting through tallying, that all recorded votes are correctly included in the final result without revealing how any individual voted.
-
D.
electoral process
The electoral process is the structured sequence of activities, rules, and institutions through which citizens select representatives or decide public issues by casting and counting votes.
-
E.
election monitor
An election monitor is an individual or organization that observes and evaluates electoral processes to ensure they are free, fair, transparent, and compliant with legal and democratic standards.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e11e3523488190badd54b5d580c00d |
completed | April 16, 2026, 5:36 p.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:28 p.m.