Triple
T2206708
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Viken county |
E50816
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | former county of Norway |
C9439
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: former county of Norway Context triple: [Viken county, instanceOf, former county of Norway]
-
A.
county of Norway
A county of Norway is a primary administrative division of the country, governed by elected regional authorities and responsible for tasks such as upper secondary education, regional planning, and public transport coordination.
-
B.
county of Sweden
A county of Sweden is an administrative region governed by a county administrative board and a regional council, responsible for implementing national policies and coordinating public services such as healthcare, transportation, and regional development.
-
C.
former province of France
A former province of France is a historical territorial and administrative region that existed before the French Revolution, often retaining distinct cultural and regional identities despite no longer having official administrative status.
-
D.
region of Finland
A region of Finland is an administrative and geographical area that groups together multiple municipalities for purposes of governance, planning, and regional identity.
-
E.
historic county of Scotland
A historic county of Scotland is a traditional territorial division that once served as an administrative and cultural unit, often retaining significance for identity, geography, and historical reference despite no longer having formal governmental functions.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a88b06709c8190978fb2418470d1b6 |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:41 p.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:46 p.m.