Triple
T22061331
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Goldman v. United States |
E545158
|
entity |
| Predicate | approachToFourthAmendment |
P146472
|
FINISHED |
| Object | property-based interpretation |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: property-based interpretation | Statement: [Goldman v. United States, approachToFourthAmendment, property-based interpretation]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: approachToFourthAmendment Context triple: [Goldman v. United States, approachToFourthAmendment, property-based interpretation]
-
A.
hasConstitutionalRights
Indicates that an entity possesses rights or protections guaranteed by a constitution in a given legal or political system.
-
B.
tenthAmendmentClaim
Indicates that a party asserts a legal claim based on the Tenth Amendment, alleging that a government action exceeds federal authority and infringes powers reserved to the states or the people.
-
C.
requiresForUnconstitutionalLaw
Indicates that one entity’s action, condition, or approval is necessary for a law to be considered unconstitutional.
-
D.
soughtPrivacy
Indicates that an entity intentionally attempted to obtain or maintain privacy from others.
-
E.
subjectToConstitution
Indicates that an entity is governed, constrained, or regulated by the rules and principles of a specific constitution.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e11e3377c48190890c17407b9527d6 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 5:36 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1285d5e508190b3124a70fe55b32e |
completed | April 28, 2026, 9:36 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e6f643ca74819083e8ab78e843f243 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 4 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e6fad4a540819096cdd5ea08527220 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 4:19 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:27 p.m.