Triple
T22061320
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Olmstead v. United States |
E545157
|
entity |
| Predicate | subsequentDoctrinalDevelopment |
P56048
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Replaced by the reasonable expectation of privacy test articulated in Katz v. United States |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Replaced by the reasonable expectation of privacy test articulated in Katz v. United States | Statement: [Olmstead v. United States, subsequentDoctrinalDevelopment, Replaced by the reasonable expectation of privacy test articulated in Katz v. United States]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: subsequentDoctrinalDevelopment Context triple: [Olmstead v. United States, subsequentDoctrinalDevelopment, Replaced by the reasonable expectation of privacy test articulated in Katz v. United States]
-
A.
doctrinalChange
chosen
Indicates a modification or shift in an established set of principles, teachings, or doctrines within a belief or rule system.
-
B.
historicalDoctrine
Indicates that one entity embodies, represents, or is associated with a doctrine, teaching, or set of principles originating from a past historical context.
-
C.
doctrinalInfluenceOn
Indicates that one doctrine has influenced, shaped, or contributed to the development of another doctrine.
-
D.
doctrinalTheme
Indicates that one entity concerns, expresses, or is characterized by a particular doctrinal or theological theme in relation to another.
-
E.
developsDoctrineInLightOf
Indicates that an entity formulates or revises its doctrine taking into account, and in response to, another specified factor or context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e11e3377c48190890c17407b9527d6 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 5:36 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1285d5e508190b3124a70fe55b32e |
completed | April 28, 2026, 9:36 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e6f643ca74819083e8ab78e843f243 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 4 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:27 p.m.