Triple
T22060358
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | AquaLogic Service Security |
E545134
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | SOA security component |
C17704
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: SOA security component Context triple: [AquaLogic Service Security, instanceOf, SOA security component]
-
A.
DISA component
A DISA component is a modular element within the Defense Information Systems Agency’s infrastructure that provides specific communication, security, or information services to support Department of Defense operations.
-
B.
web services security product
chosen
A web services security product is a software solution that protects APIs and web-based services from unauthorized access, data breaches, and attacks by providing authentication, authorization, encryption, and threat detection capabilities.
-
C.
security architecture
Security architecture is the structured design of an organization's security controls, principles, and technologies that work together to protect systems, data, and operations from threats and vulnerabilities.
-
D.
mainframe security product
A mainframe security product is a software solution that protects mainframe systems by controlling access, monitoring activity, enforcing compliance policies, and safeguarding critical data and applications from internal and external threats.
-
E.
software security technology
Software security technology encompasses the tools, techniques, and practices designed to protect software systems from vulnerabilities, attacks, and unauthorized access throughout their lifecycle.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e11e3377c48190890c17407b9527d6 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 5:36 p.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:27 p.m.