Triple
T22019239
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Aar basin |
E543794
|
entity |
| Predicate | containsCity |
P294
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Brugg |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Brugg | Statement: [Aar basin, containsCity, Brugg]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Brugg Context triple: [Aar basin, containsCity, Brugg]
-
A.
Brugg
chosen
Brugg is a historic Swiss town in the canton of Aargau, known for its medieval heritage and strategic location near the confluence of the Aare, Reuss, and Limmat rivers.
-
B.
Heerbrugg
Heerbrugg is a village in the canton of St. Gallen in northeastern Switzerland, known as a regional transport hub and industrial center, particularly for precision optics and surveying technology.
-
C.
Maasbracht
Maasbracht is a town in the Dutch province of Limburg, known as an inland port and industrial center along the River Meuse.
-
D.
Beringen
Beringen is a city and municipality in the Belgian province of Limburg, known for its coal mining heritage and the be-MINE industrial heritage site.
-
E.
Beringen
Beringen is a municipality in northern Switzerland known for its location near the Rhine and its surrounding vineyards and rural landscapes.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e11e2e8ea4819084210fe06d3a1b8d |
completed | April 16, 2026, 5:36 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f127c5929881908458d07bd33c5edd |
completed | April 28, 2026, 9:33 p.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:23 p.m.