Triple

T2201198
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Mississippi River basin E50492 entity
Predicate drainagePercentageOfUS P36927 FINISHED
Object about 41 percent LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: about 41 percent | Statement: [Mississippi River basin, drainagePercentageOfUS, about 41 percent]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: drainagePercentageOfUS
Context triple: [Mississippi River basin, drainagePercentageOfUS, about 41 percent]
  • A. areaWaterPercentage
    Indicates the proportion of an entity’s total area that is covered by water, typically expressed as a percentage.
  • B. drainageAreaApprox
    Indicates that one entity has an approximate drainage area measured or characterized by the other entity.
  • C. drainageType
    Indicates the kind or classification of drainage associated with or applied to an entity (e.g., how water is removed or flows from it).
  • D. drainsInto
    Indicates that one entity serves as a source or conduit whose contents or flow are directed into another entity.
  • E. dischargeRankInNorthAmerica
    Indicates the relative ranking of an entity based on its discharge (e.g., flow or output) compared to others within North America.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a88b044ab48190add007487680f009 completed March 4, 2026, 7:41 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abbfa1b41c8190b0f7467d0dcdfbcd completed March 7, 2026, 6:03 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69abbda706f4819094de73e1d1d1f539 completed March 7, 2026, 5:54 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69abbf35c994819088a093c412931de4 completed March 7, 2026, 6:01 a.m.
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:46 p.m.