Triple
T21995578
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Joan II, Countess of Burgundy |
E543197
|
entity |
| Predicate | father |
P120
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Otto IV, Count of Burgundy |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Otto IV, Count of Burgundy | Statement: [Joan II, Countess of Burgundy, father, Otto IV, Count of Burgundy]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Otto IV, Count of Burgundy Context triple: [Joan II, Countess of Burgundy, father, Otto IV, Count of Burgundy]
-
A.
Otto-William, Count of Burgundy
Otto-William, Count of Burgundy was a powerful late 10th- and early 11th-century noble who ruled the County of Burgundy and played a key role in the politics of the Kingdom of Burgundy and the early Capetian realm.
-
B.
Otto I, Count of Burgundy
Otto I, Count of Burgundy was a 12th-century nobleman of the Hohenstaufen dynasty who ruled the Free County of Burgundy and played a role in the politics of the Holy Roman Empire.
-
C.
Rudolf III of Burgundy
Rudolf III of Burgundy was the last independent king of the Kingdom of Burgundy, whose death in 1032 led to its incorporation into the Holy Roman Empire.
-
D.
William I, Count of Burgundy
William I, Count of Burgundy was an influential 11th–12th century French nobleman of the House of Ivrea who ruled the County of Burgundy and played a significant role in the politics of medieval France and the Holy Roman Empire.
-
E.
Theobald I, Duke of Lorraine
Theobald I, Duke of Lorraine, was a 10th-century nobleman who ruled the Duchy of Lorraine within the Holy Roman Empire and played a role in the region’s early medieval power struggles.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Otto IV, Count of Burgundy Target entity description: Otto IV, Count of Burgundy was a 13th-century nobleman of the House of Andechs who ruled the Free County of Burgundy and played a notable role in the politics of the Holy Roman Empire.
-
A.
Otto-William, Count of Burgundy
Otto-William, Count of Burgundy was a powerful late 10th- and early 11th-century noble who ruled the County of Burgundy and played a key role in the politics of the Kingdom of Burgundy and the early Capetian realm.
-
B.
Otto I, Count of Burgundy
Otto I, Count of Burgundy was a 12th-century nobleman of the Hohenstaufen dynasty who ruled the Free County of Burgundy and played a role in the politics of the Holy Roman Empire.
-
C.
Rudolf III of Burgundy
Rudolf III of Burgundy was the last independent king of the Kingdom of Burgundy, whose death in 1032 led to its incorporation into the Holy Roman Empire.
-
D.
William I, Count of Burgundy
William I, Count of Burgundy was an influential 11th–12th century French nobleman of the House of Ivrea who ruled the County of Burgundy and played a significant role in the politics of medieval France and the Holy Roman Empire.
-
E.
Theobald I, Duke of Lorraine
Theobald I, Duke of Lorraine, was a 10th-century nobleman who ruled the Duchy of Lorraine within the Holy Roman Empire and played a role in the region’s early medieval power struggles.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e11e2c814c8190837d072789000486 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 5:36 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1276493bc81908567445e901bc3a7 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 9:32 p.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:19 p.m.