Triple

T21989697
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Japanese Industrial Standards E543049 entity
Predicate JISMarkIndicates P36207 FINISHED
Object conformity to JIS LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: conformity to JIS | Statement: [Japanese Industrial Standards, JISMarkIndicates, conformity to JIS]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: JISMarkIndicates
Context triple: [Japanese Industrial Standards, JISMarkIndicates, conformity to JIS]
  • A. distinctiveMarking
    Indicates that one entity bears a unique or distinguishing visual feature or pattern that sets it apart from others.
  • B. mayHaveMarkings
    Indicates that an entity is permitted or able to possess certain markings or distinguishing signs.
  • C. JapaneseDesignation
    Indicates that one entity is formally designated, named, or classified in the Japanese language or by a Japanese authority.
  • D. hasJISRouteClassification
    Indicates that a route is assigned a specific classification according to the Japanese Industrial Standards (JIS) route categorization system.
  • E. certificationJapan chosen
    Indicates that an entity holds or is associated with a certification that is specific to or recognized in Japan.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0c48136b081908831fa907cc02e18 completed April 16, 2026, 11:14 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f1270cb67c81909a3aa2dc61c1894f completed April 28, 2026, 9:30 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e6f6154e408190acc5b2c278acaff4 completed April 21, 2026, 3:59 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:05 p.m.