Triple
T21972273
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Grenville County |
E542618
|
entity |
| Predicate | borderedBy |
P224
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Leeds County |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Leeds County | Statement: [Grenville County, borderedBy, Leeds County]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Leeds County Context triple: [Grenville County, borderedBy, Leeds County]
-
A.
Leeds County
chosen
Leeds County was a historic county in eastern Ontario, Canada, that later became part of the United Counties of Leeds and Grenville.
-
B.
Bradford County
Bradford County is a largely rural county in northern Pennsylvania known for its agricultural landscape, small towns, and location along the New York state border.
-
C.
Bradford County
Bradford County is a rural county in north-central Florida known for its small-town communities, agriculture, and the county seat of Starke.
-
D.
Oldham County
Oldham County is a sparsely populated rural county in the Texas Panhandle known for its ranching heritage and location along historic Route 66.
-
E.
Rypin County
Rypin County is a historical administrative district in Poland that existed within the interwar Warsaw Voivodeship.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0c48070988190909db97667b9a0ac |
completed | April 16, 2026, 11:14 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f124857dcc8190ab474cd8ab9c130a |
completed | April 28, 2026, 9:20 p.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 8:02 p.m.