Triple
T2196102
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Mare Liberum |
E49976
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalArgumentBasis |
P4756
|
FINISHED |
| Object | natural law |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: natural law | Statement: [Mare Liberum, legalArgumentBasis, natural law]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalArgumentBasis Context triple: [Mare Liberum, legalArgumentBasis, natural law]
-
A.
legalBasis
Indicates the legal rule, authority, or justification under which an action, decision, or status is established or carried out.
-
B.
arguedUnder
Indicates that one entity presented arguments or conducted a legal case under the supervision, authority, or guidance of another entity (such as a mentor, attorney, or judge).
-
C.
legalBasisWeakenedBy
Indicates that the legal force, validity, or effectiveness of something is reduced or undermined by another factor, action, or decision.
-
D.
legalDoctrine
chosen
Indicates that one legal principle, rule, or theory is being applied, referenced, or relied upon as an authoritative basis for interpreting or deciding a legal issue.
-
E.
legalDoctrineChallenged
Indicates that a particular legal doctrine is being disputed, questioned, or contested, typically through litigation or formal legal argument.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a88aaba3c48190b351cab9b26989ff |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:40 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abbf77e4f08190a1f5ea601d306596 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 6:02 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abbda52328819089c7ab111bebb0ca |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:54 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:46 p.m.