Triple

T21921983
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Baker v. Carr E541340 entity
Predicate legalIssue P1640 FINISHED
Object political question doctrine — NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: political question doctrine | Statement: [Baker v. Carr, legalIssue, political question doctrine]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: political question doctrine
Context triple: [Baker v. Carr, legalIssue, political question doctrine]
  • A. political question doctrine chosen
    The political question doctrine is a principle in U.S. constitutional law under which courts decline to decide certain issues deemed more appropriately resolved by the political branches rather than the judiciary.
  • B. anti-commandeering doctrine in United States constitutional law
    The anti-commandeering doctrine in United States constitutional law is a principle derived from the Tenth Amendment that prohibits the federal government from requiring state or local officials to implement or enforce federal regulatory programs.
  • C. Lawson Doctrine
    The Lawson Doctrine is an economic policy principle associated with former UK Chancellor Nigel Lawson, emphasizing the importance of controlling inflation through monetary policy while allowing market forces greater freedom in shaping the economy.
  • D. Bivens doctrine
    The Bivens doctrine is a judicially created legal principle that allows individuals to seek damages in federal court against U.S. federal officials for certain constitutional rights violations, despite the general barrier of sovereign immunity.
  • E. Cooley doctrine
    The Cooley doctrine is a constitutional principle derived from the Supreme Court’s decision in Cooley v. Board of Wardens that allows states to regulate aspects of interstate commerce that are local in nature and do not require uniform national rules.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0c47d74488190a15119108794a307 completed April 16, 2026, 11:14 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f1233c29008190b84ae551b14eb2db completed April 28, 2026, 9:14 p.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 7:45 p.m.