Triple

T21921972
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Charles W. Baker et al. v. Joe C. Carr, Secretary of State of Tennessee, et al. E541340 entity
Predicate shortName P43 FINISHED
Object Baker v. Carr — NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Baker v. Carr | Statement: [Charles W. Baker et al. v. Joe C. Carr, Secretary of State of Tennessee, et al., shortName, Baker v. Carr]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Baker v. Carr
Context triple: [Charles W. Baker et al. v. Joe C. Carr, Secretary of State of Tennessee, et al., shortName, Baker v. Carr]
  • A. Baker v. Carr chosen
    Baker v. Carr is a landmark 1962 U.S. Supreme Court case that established federal courts’ authority to hear legislative redistricting disputes under the Equal Protection Clause, paving the way for the “one person, one vote” principle.
  • B. Wesberry v. Sanders
    Wesberry v. Sanders is a 1964 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the principle that congressional districts must be drawn so that each person's vote is as equal in weight as practicable, laying groundwork for the "one person, one vote" standard.
  • C. Reynolds v. Sims decision
    The Reynolds v. Sims decision is a landmark 1964 U.S. Supreme Court ruling that established the “one person, one vote” principle by requiring state legislative districts to be roughly equal in population under the Equal Protection Clause.
  • D. South Carolina v. Katzenbach
    South Carolina v. Katzenbach is a 1966 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld the constitutionality of key provisions of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, affirming broad federal power to combat racial discrimination in voting.
  • E. Katzenbach v. McClung
    Katzenbach v. McClung is a 1964 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the federal government’s power to prohibit racial discrimination in local restaurants under the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0c47d74488190a15119108794a307 completed April 16, 2026, 11:14 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f1233c29008190b84ae551b14eb2db completed April 28, 2026, 9:14 p.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 7:45 p.m.