Triple
T21914667
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Gmina Dwikozy |
E541152
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasSettlement |
P1068
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Nowy Garbów |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Nowy Garbów | Statement: [Gmina Dwikozy, hasSettlement, Nowy Garbów]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Nowy Garbów Context triple: [Gmina Dwikozy, hasSettlement, Nowy Garbów]
-
A.
Garbów
chosen
Garbów is a village in south-eastern Poland located within the administrative district of Gmina Dwikozy in the Świętokrzyskie region.
-
B.
Stary Garbów
Stary Garbów is a village in southeastern Poland located within the administrative district of Gmina Zawichost in the Świętokrzyskie Voivodeship.
-
C.
Działdowo
Działdowo is a town in northern Poland known for its historical significance and location within the Warmian-Masurian Voivodeship.
-
D.
Nowa Dęba
Nowa Dęba is a small town in southeastern Poland, known for its industrial traditions and location in the Subcarpathian Voivodeship.
-
E.
Grochów
Grochów is a historic residential district in the Praga-Południe area of Warsaw, Poland, known for its pre-war architecture and role in the city’s industrial and working-class heritage.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0c47c4b9c8190a5586a75f5f36453 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 11:14 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f123366cb88190a42aa741e1245fd9 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 9:14 p.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 7:42 p.m.