Triple
T2186839
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Miramare Marine Reserve |
E49169
|
entity |
| Predicate | isManagedFor |
P37182
|
FINISHED |
| Object | nature conservation |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: nature conservation | Statement: [Miramare Marine Reserve, isManagedFor, nature conservation]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isManagedFor Context triple: [Miramare Marine Reserve, isManagedFor, nature conservation]
-
A.
hasManagement
Indicates that one entity exercises managerial authority or oversight over another entity.
-
B.
managedIn
Indicates that one entity is administered, operated, or overseen within the scope, control, or jurisdiction of another entity.
-
C.
isPassivelyManaged
Indicates that an entity (such as a fund or portfolio) is managed according to a passive strategy that tracks a benchmark or index rather than using active selection or frequent trading.
-
D.
hasTypeOfManagement
Indicates that an entity is associated with or operates under a specified form or style of management.
-
E.
managedAs
Indicates that one entity is administered, controlled, or handled in the same way or under the same policies, procedures, or classification as another entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a88aa72d348190a9544bb5b8a4e71d |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:40 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abbf9e99f08190892d34485c8f2f25 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 6:03 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abbda32d1881909d1fd83a751fb21c |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:54 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69abbf9c77fc8190a323bcaf644fb2c5 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 6:03 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:45 p.m.