Triple
T2186338
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Āṯūrāyē |
E49160
|
entity |
| Predicate | historicalContinuityClaim |
P8384
|
FINISHED |
| Object | descendants of ancient Assyrians |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: descendants of ancient Assyrians | Statement: [Āṯūrāyē, historicalContinuityClaim, descendants of ancient Assyrians]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: historicalContinuityClaim Context triple: [Āṯūrāyē, historicalContinuityClaim, descendants of ancient Assyrians]
-
A.
historicalContinuity
chosen
Indicates that a relationship, pattern, or state persists over time in a way that links past conditions or events to present ones without significant interruption or change.
-
B.
historicalClaim
Indicates that an entity asserts or presents a statement about past events or conditions as a matter of historical fact.
-
C.
historicalExistence
Indicates that an entity actually existed at some point in real-world history, as opposed to being fictional, hypothetical, or mythological.
-
D.
historicallyConsidered
Indicates that one entity has been regarded or classified in a particular way relative to another entity during a past historical period.
-
E.
historicalCondition
Indicates that one entity represents a condition, state, or circumstance that applied to another entity at some point in the past.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a88aa72d348190a9544bb5b8a4e71d |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:40 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abbf9e99f08190892d34485c8f2f25 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 6:03 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abbda32d1881909d1fd83a751fb21c |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:54 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:45 p.m.