Triple

T2185378
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Marriage Office E49140 entity
Predicate appliesDoctrine P4473 FINISHED
Object Catholic doctrine on marriage LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Catholic doctrine on marriage | Statement: [Marriage Office, appliesDoctrine, Catholic doctrine on marriage]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: appliesDoctrine
Context triple: [Marriage Office, appliesDoctrine, Catholic doctrine on marriage]
  • A. appliedDoctrine
    Indicates that a particular doctrine, principle, or rule has been put into practice or used in interpreting or deciding a specific case, situation, or context.
  • B. usesDoctrine chosen
    Indicates that one entity applies, follows, or relies on a particular doctrine in its actions or reasoning.
  • C. containsDoctrine
    Indicates that one entity includes, embodies, or incorporates the doctrine, principles, or teachings represented by another entity.
  • D. createdDoctrine
    Indicates that an entity originated, formulated, or established a particular doctrine, theory, or set of principles.
  • E. developedDoctrine
    Indicates that one entity created, formulated, or significantly advanced a particular doctrine or set of principles.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a88aa72d348190a9544bb5b8a4e71d completed March 4, 2026, 7:40 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abbf9e99f08190892d34485c8f2f25 completed March 7, 2026, 6:03 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69abbda32d1881909d1fd83a751fb21c completed March 7, 2026, 5:54 a.m.
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:45 p.m.