Triple
T21841159
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Luiz Antônio de Carvalho Ferraz |
E539255
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Brazilian Navy officer |
C192
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: Brazilian Navy officer Context triple: [Luiz Antônio de Carvalho Ferraz, instanceOf, Brazilian Navy officer]
-
A.
Brazilian military officer
A Brazilian military officer is a commissioned member of Brazil’s Armed Forces responsible for leading troops, planning and executing military operations, and upholding national defense and security in accordance with Brazilian law and military doctrine.
-
B.
Argentine naval officer
An Argentine naval officer is a commissioned member of Argentina’s navy responsible for leading personnel, operating and commanding naval vessels or units, and executing maritime defense, security, and strategic missions under national and international regulations.
-
C.
naval officer
chosen
A naval officer is a commissioned leader in a navy responsible for commanding personnel and vessels, making strategic and tactical decisions, and ensuring the effective operation and readiness of maritime forces.
-
D.
Chilean admiral
A Chilean admiral is a senior naval officer of the Chilean Navy responsible for high-level command, strategic planning, and leadership of maritime defense operations.
-
E.
Portuguese military commander
A Portuguese military commander is a high-ranking officer responsible for planning, directing, and overseeing military operations and personnel within Portugal’s armed forces or in joint international missions.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0c476c3c88190a92d08ebb59a128a |
completed | April 16, 2026, 11:13 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 6:55 p.m.