Triple
T21830643
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Indiana Constitution Article 1 Section 3 |
E538983
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasHigherLawStatusThan |
P5068
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Indiana statutory law |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Indiana statutory law | Statement: [Indiana Constitution Article 1 Section 3, hasHigherLawStatusThan, Indiana statutory law]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasHigherLawStatusThan Context triple: [Indiana Constitution Article 1 Section 3, hasHigherLawStatusThan, Indiana statutory law]
-
A.
hasHigherJurisdiction
chosen
Indicates that one authority or legal body possesses superior legal power or decision-making control over another within a defined domain or scope.
-
B.
hasLegalStatusOver
Indicates that one entity holds a recognized legal authority, jurisdiction, or standing in relation to another entity.
-
C.
hasLegalStatus
Indicates that an entity possesses a particular legal classification, recognition, or standing under law.
-
D.
hasHighestLegalStatusWithinCountry
Indicates that an entity holds the topmost legally recognized status or rank within a specific country, above all other comparable statuses.
-
E.
legalStatusAffirmedIn
Indicates that an entity’s legal status has been formally confirmed or upheld within a specified legal jurisdiction, document, or proceeding.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0c475cda88190987d08f23caebdc1 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 11:13 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f0913554508190b81347f01d3903e8 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 10:51 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e6be8c14748190bdcc44a14d50bea4 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 12:02 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 6:54 p.m.