Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Mhadei water dispute | Statement: [Mhadei River, isSubjectOf, Mhadei water dispute]

Target entity: Mhadei water dispute
Context triple: [Mhadei River, isSubjectOf, Mhadei water dispute]

• A. Krishna Water Disputes Tribunal
  The Krishna Water Disputes Tribunal is a judicial body established by the Indian government to adjudicate and allocate the Krishna River’s waters among the riparian states.
• B. Narmada Water Disputes Tribunal Award
  The Narmada Water Disputes Tribunal Award is a landmark legal decision that allocated the waters of the Narmada River among Indian states and set key conditions for projects like the Sardar Sarovar Dam.
• C. In re Cauvery Water Disputes Tribunal, 1992
  In re Cauvery Water Disputes Tribunal, 1992 is a landmark Supreme Court of India advisory opinion concerning the interstate Cauvery River water dispute between Karnataka and Tamil Nadu.
• D. Narmada Bachao Andolan v. Union of India
  Narmada Bachao Andolan v. Union of India is a landmark Supreme Court of India case that examined environmental, displacement, and development issues surrounding large dam construction on the Narmada River.
• E. Inter‑State Water Disputes Act, 1956
  The Inter‑State Water Disputes Act, 1956 is an Indian law that provides the legal framework and mechanism for resolving water-sharing conflicts between states through specialized tribunals.
• F. None of above. chosen
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Target entity: Mhadei water dispute
Target entity description: The Mhadei water dispute is a long-running interstate conflict in India between Goa, Karnataka, and Maharashtra over the sharing and diversion of the Mhadei (Mandovi) River’s waters.

• A. Krishna Water Disputes Tribunal
  The Krishna Water Disputes Tribunal is a judicial body established by the Indian government to adjudicate and allocate the Krishna River’s waters among the riparian states.
• B. Narmada Water Disputes Tribunal Award
  The Narmada Water Disputes Tribunal Award is a landmark legal decision that allocated the waters of the Narmada River among Indian states and set key conditions for projects like the Sardar Sarovar Dam.
• C. In re Cauvery Water Disputes Tribunal, 1992
  In re Cauvery Water Disputes Tribunal, 1992 is a landmark Supreme Court of India advisory opinion concerning the interstate Cauvery River water dispute between Karnataka and Tamil Nadu.
• D. Narmada Bachao Andolan v. Union of India
  Narmada Bachao Andolan v. Union of India is a landmark Supreme Court of India case that examined environmental, displacement, and development issues surrounding large dam construction on the Narmada River.
• E. Inter‑State Water Disputes Act, 1956
  The Inter‑State Water Disputes Act, 1956 is an Indian law that provides the legal framework and mechanism for resolving water-sharing conflicts between states through specialized tribunals.
• F. None of above. chosen