Triple
T21817475
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | EU–Japan joint committee under the SPA |
E538639
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | implementation body under an international agreement |
C39728
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: implementation body under an international agreement Context triple: [EU–Japan joint committee under the SPA, instanceOf, implementation body under an international agreement]
-
A.
international agreement implementation area
The international agreement implementation area is a defined domain—such as a sector, region, or policy field—within which the provisions of an international agreement are applied, monitored, and enforced.
-
B.
implementation bodies
chosen
Implementation bodies are concrete organizational units or teams responsible for executing, managing, and maintaining the practical realization of a system’s design or policy in an operational environment.
-
C.
international agreement
An international agreement is a formal, negotiated arrangement between two or more sovereign states or international organizations that creates binding obligations under international law.
-
D.
treaty implementation rules
Treaty implementation rules are the detailed legal and administrative provisions that translate a treaty’s general obligations into specific, enforceable procedures and standards within a jurisdiction.
-
E.
party to an international treaty
A party to an international treaty is a state or international organization that has formally consented to be bound by the treaty’s terms in accordance with international law.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0c475038c8190abb9b1a20eb8ff50 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 11:13 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 6:54 p.m.