Triple
T21802568
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | LSP PDU |
E538272
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | link-state routing message |
C25197
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: link-state routing message Context triple: [LSP PDU, instanceOf, link-state routing message]
-
A.
link-layer protocol
A link-layer protocol defines the rules and procedures for reliable data transfer, framing, addressing, and error handling between directly connected network devices on a physical medium.
-
B.
advanced distance-vector routing protocol
An advanced distance-vector routing protocol is a network routing method that enhances traditional distance-vector algorithms with features like triggered updates, route poisoning, split horizon, and loop prevention mechanisms to achieve faster convergence and more reliable path selection.
-
C.
path vector protocol
A path vector protocol is a type of routing protocol that advertises network reachability information along with the full path (sequence of autonomous systems or routers) to each destination, enabling loop avoidance and policy-based routing decisions.
-
D.
IEEE 802.2 LLC field
The IEEE 802.2 LLC field is a header component in data link layer frames that provides logical link control functions such as addressing, flow control, and error notification between network devices.
-
E.
network protocol control message
chosen
A network protocol control message is a specialized communication unit used to manage, coordinate, and regulate the behavior and state of network connections and data exchange between devices.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0c4733f4081909a86622e7e6d15d2 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 11:13 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 6:53 p.m.