Triple

T2178076
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Allegheny, Pennsylvania E48576 entity
Predicate annexationControversy P37667 FINISHED
Object local opposition to merger with Pittsburgh LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: local opposition to merger with Pittsburgh | Statement: [Allegheny, Pennsylvania, annexationControversy, local opposition to merger with Pittsburgh]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: annexationControversy
Context triple: [Allegheny, Pennsylvania, annexationControversy, local opposition to merger with Pittsburgh]
  • A. annexationPolicy
    Indicates a policy or practice of formally incorporating one territory into the jurisdiction or sovereignty of another.
  • B. annexationBasis
    Indicates the legal, political, or historical grounds used to justify the annexation of one territory by another.
  • C. annexationInstrument
    Indicates the legal or formal instrument (such as a treaty, decree, or law) by which one entity annexes or incorporates another.
  • D. partialAnnexationBy
    Indicates a relationship where one entity has annexed or incorporated only a portion of another entity’s territory, authority, or structure, rather than taking it over in full.
  • E. annexationDate
    Indicates the date on which one entity formally annexed or incorporated another entity into its territory or jurisdiction.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a88aa3faa48190995b233af6525815 completed March 4, 2026, 7:40 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abc4358fc88190a6f556c2de9fef8c completed March 7, 2026, 6:22 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69abbda0ec948190be88c1243d81a423 completed March 7, 2026, 5:54 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69abc434978c8190b9c4dd8411b87f23 completed March 7, 2026, 6:22 a.m.
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:45 p.m.