Triple
T21708475
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Office of Defense Cooperation |
E535832
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | security cooperation office |
C37992
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: security cooperation office Context triple: [Office of Defense Cooperation, instanceOf, security cooperation office]
-
A.
security cooperation organization
chosen
A security cooperation organization is an entity that plans, coordinates, and executes collaborative defense and security activities among partner nations or agencies to enhance mutual security capabilities and strategic objectives.
-
B.
security partnership
A security partnership is a collaborative relationship between organizations, agencies, or nations to share resources, information, and responsibilities for preventing, detecting, and responding to security threats.
-
C.
security agency
A security agency is an organization that provides professional protection, surveillance, and risk management services to safeguard people, property, and information.
-
D.
cybersecurity coordination body
A cybersecurity coordination body is an organization that facilitates collaboration, information sharing, and joint response among stakeholders to prevent, detect, and mitigate cyber threats.
-
E.
cooperative security activity
A cooperative security activity is a coordinated effort among multiple actors—such as states, organizations, or agencies—to jointly prevent, mitigate, or respond to security threats through shared information, resources, and actions.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0c46b44c0819088ab883ebd44e0e8 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 11:13 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 6:46 p.m.