Triple

T2169682
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Nikolaj Bjørner E46992 entity
Predicate toolDeveloperFor P37347 FINISHED
Object SMT-based verification tools LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: SMT-based verification tools | Statement: [Nikolaj Bjørner, toolDeveloperFor, SMT-based verification tools]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: toolDeveloperFor
Context triple: [Nikolaj Bjørner, toolDeveloperFor, SMT-based verification tools]
  • A. toolIn
    Indicates that one entity is a tool or instrument used in or associated with another entity or context.
  • B. toolUsed
    Indicates that an action or task is performed using a particular tool as the means or instrument.
  • C. coPilotWith
    Indicates that two entities jointly serve as pilots or share piloting responsibilities for the same vehicle or mission.
  • D. toolUseExamples
    Indicates that one entity provides example instances or demonstrations of how a particular tool is or can be used by another entity.
  • E. developmentFunction
    Indicates a relationship where one entity serves as a function, role, or mechanism that drives, supports, or shapes the development or growth of another entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a88a184cbc8190877791f6552c2484 completed March 4, 2026, 7:38 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abc1559ff481908efe3f214b2570dc completed March 7, 2026, 6:10 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69abbd9efc1c81909a65044a1ffc9038 completed March 7, 2026, 5:54 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69abc153b22481908115e5f582c93f12 completed March 7, 2026, 6:10 a.m.
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:45 p.m.