Triple
T21673891
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Forty Licks |
E534918
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasPart |
P35
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Fool to Cry |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Fool to Cry | Statement: [Forty Licks, hasPart, Fool to Cry]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Fool to Cry Context triple: [Forty Licks, hasPart, Fool to Cry]
-
A.
Fool to Cry
chosen
"Fool to Cry" is a soulful 1976 ballad by The Rolling Stones, noted for its emotional lyrics, falsetto vocals by Mick Jagger, and prominent use of electric piano and string arrangements.
-
B.
Fool That I Am
"Fool That I Am" is a soulful ballad best known from its classic rhythm and blues recordings, notably by Etta James.
-
C.
Who's Crying Now
"Who's Crying Now" is a popular rock ballad by the American band Journey, featured on their 1981 album "Escape" and known for its emotive vocals and memorable guitar solo.
-
D.
Will A Fool
Will A Fool is an American hip-hop record producer known for crafting melodic, hard-hitting beats for prominent rap artists.
-
E.
A Fool to Care
A Fool to Care is a 2015 studio album by American singer-songwriter Boz Scaggs that blends soul, blues, rock, and R&B influences.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0c46898008190aa618a4af55bd1ee |
completed | April 16, 2026, 11:13 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ef8a0e06688190a75ea29534f5eed3 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 4:08 p.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 6:41 p.m.