Triple

T21655145
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Twin Lakes (Connecticut) E534441 entity
Predicate hasPart P35 FINISHED
Object East Twin Lake — NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: East Twin Lake | Statement: [Twin Lakes (Connecticut), hasPart, East Twin Lake]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: East Twin Lake
Context triple: [Twin Lakes (Connecticut), hasPart, East Twin Lake]
  • A. Twin Lakes chosen
    Twin Lakes is a scenic pair of freshwater lakes in northwestern Connecticut known for boating, fishing, and rural New England charm.
  • B. Twin Lakes
    Twin Lakes is a pair of high-elevation alpine lakes popular for hiking and scenic views in Utah’s Big Cottonwood Canyon.
  • C. Twin Lakes
    Twin Lakes is a scenic pair of alpine lakes in California’s eastern Sierra Nevada, popular for fishing, camping, and hiking near the town of Mammoth Lakes.
  • D. Twin Lakes
    Twin Lakes is a pair of scenic freshwater lakes located within Kittatinny Valley State Park in New Jersey, popular for fishing, boating, and nature recreation.
  • E. Twin Lakes
    Twin Lakes is a pair of scenic freshwater lakes in northern Idaho known for recreation such as boating, fishing, and lakeside living.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0c467e1f48190af2650b19175abc4 completed April 16, 2026, 11:13 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ef59176b28819092384fc5f8968022 completed April 27, 2026, 12:39 p.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 6:36 p.m.