Triple

T216509
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Pauling electronegativity scale E4115 entity
Predicate trendDownGroup P9720 FINISHED
Object generally decreases down a group LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: generally decreases down a group | Statement: [Pauling electronegativity scale, trendDownGroup, generally decreases down a group]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: trendDownGroup
Context triple: [Pauling electronegativity scale, trendDownGroup, generally decreases down a group]
  • A. hasTrend
    Indicates that something exhibits or is associated with a particular pattern of change or direction over time.
  • B. declineBeganInDecade
    Indicates that the period of decline for an entity or phenomenon started during the specified decade.
  • C. dropType
    Indicates the manner or category of how something is dropped, released, or caused to fall.
  • D. economicTrend
    Indicates the general direction or pattern of economic activity or conditions over a period of time.
  • E. decayMode
    Indicates the specific process or pathway by which an unstable entity transforms or decays into other products.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a2573508588190b522c2476d91acfe completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:47 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a25dcd2b208190855d5d8d70a3acfc completed Feb. 28, 2026, 3:15 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a25b52190481908f299d26122bafd2 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 3:04 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a25dcba5148190ab80fd14c7cf4bb4 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 3:15 a.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:53 a.m.