Triple
T21625976
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Kugu |
E533702
|
entity |
| Predicate | languageSubgroup |
P1967
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Wik languages |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Wik languages | Statement: [Kugu, languageSubgroup, Wik languages]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Wik languages Context triple: [Kugu, languageSubgroup, Wik languages]
-
A.
Wik languages
chosen
Wik languages are a group of closely related Australian Aboriginal languages traditionally spoken by the Wik peoples of western Cape York Peninsula in Queensland.
-
B.
Wik language group
The Wik language group is a cluster of closely related Australian Aboriginal languages traditionally spoken by the Wik peoples of western Cape York Peninsula in Queensland.
-
C.
Wa language
The Wa language is a Mon–Khmer language spoken primarily by the Wa people in parts of Myanmar and China.
-
D.
Li languages
Li languages are a group of closely related Kra–Dai languages spoken primarily by the Li (Hlai) people on China’s Hainan Island.
-
E.
Tiwa languages
The Tiwa languages are a group of closely related Tanoan languages spoken by Tiwa Pueblo peoples in parts of New Mexico and Texas.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0c464fba881908d0ff2ac80511ce1 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 11:13 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ef52131f2c8190b9966adf43a0fe4f |
completed | April 27, 2026, 12:09 p.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 6:34 p.m.