Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Wik Peoples v Queensland (1996) | Statement: [Wik, hasNotableEvent, Wik Peoples v Queensland (1996)]

Target entity: Wik Peoples v Queensland (1996)
Context triple: [Wik, hasNotableEvent, Wik Peoples v Queensland (1996)]

• A. Wik Peoples v Queensland chosen
  Wik Peoples v Queensland is a landmark 1996 High Court of Australia case that held native title rights could coexist with pastoral leases, significantly shaping Australian land and Indigenous rights law.
• B. Mabo v Queensland (No 2)
  Mabo v Queensland (No 2) is a landmark 1992 High Court of Australia decision that recognized native title and overturned the doctrine of terra nullius in relation to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander land rights.
• C. Banjima People v State of Western Australia (2013)
  Banjima People v State of Western Australia (2013) is a landmark Federal Court decision that formally recognized the Banjima people’s native title rights over a large area of land in Western Australia’s Pilbara region.
• D. Dunghutti People v Commonwealth of Australia (native title case)
  Dunghutti People v Commonwealth of Australia is a landmark Australian native title case in which the Dunghutti people secured one of the first formal recognitions of Indigenous land rights on the New South Wales mainland.
• E. R v. Marshall (1999)
  R v. Marshall (1999) is a landmark Supreme Court of Canada decision that affirmed Mi'kmaq treaty rights to fish and hunt for a moderate livelihood based on 18th-century Peace and Friendship Treaties.
• F. None of above.
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.