Triple

T21609642
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Bosambo E533266 entity
Predicate relationshipTypeWithCommissionerSanders P144773 FINISHED
Object ally LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: ally | Statement: [Bosambo, relationshipTypeWithCommissionerSanders, ally]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relationshipTypeWithCommissionerSanders
Context triple: [Bosambo, relationshipTypeWithCommissionerSanders, ally]
  • A. relationshipWithAnnShankland
    Indicates that an entity has some form of personal or professional relationship with Ann Shankland.
  • B. relationshipTypeWithAnnShankland
    Indicates the specific type or nature of the relationship that an entity has with Ann Shankland.
  • C. relationshipToGovernor
    Indicates the specific familial, professional, or social relationship that one entity has to a governor.
  • D. relationshipTypeWithShaneMcCutcheon
    Indicates the specific nature or category of relationship that an entity has with Shane McCutcheon.
  • E. hasPoliticalRelationshipWith
    Indicates a political connection or association between two entities, such as alliances, rivalries, collaborations, or other forms of political interaction.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0c46411108190bba0d4176dffc9f3 completed April 16, 2026, 11:13 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ef17e7d1388190922a90cb91ec9fc4 completed April 27, 2026, 8:01 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e69665fe8c8190af7e38785db188b2 completed April 20, 2026, 9:11 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69e69b4aa2b48190830107391e81571a completed April 20, 2026, 9:31 p.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 6:33 p.m.