Triple

T21583253
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Egypt gained control of Adana for a time E532572 entity
Predicate precededBy P97 FINISHED
Object Egyptian conquest of Syria NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (3 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Egyptian conquest of Syria | Statement: [Egypt gained control of Adana for a time, precededBy, Egyptian conquest of Syria]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Egyptian conquest of Syria
Context triple: [Egypt gained control of Adana for a time, precededBy, Egyptian conquest of Syria]
  • A. Assyrian conquest of Egypt
    The Assyrian conquest of Egypt was a series of late 7th-century BCE military campaigns in which the Neo-Assyrian Empire invaded, defeated, and temporarily dominated Egypt, toppling the Nubian-led 25th Dynasty.
  • B. Conquest of Egypt
    The Conquest of Egypt was the Persian king Cambyses II’s successful military campaign in 525 BCE that brought Egypt under Achaemenid rule and ended the independence of the ancient Egyptian kingdom.
  • C. Conquest of Egypt
    The Conquest of Egypt was the 1517 Ottoman campaign that toppled the Mamluk Sultanate and brought Egypt—and with it control of the holy cities and key trade routes—under Ottoman rule.
  • D. Siege of Avaris
    The Siege of Avaris was the decisive military operation in which Ahmose I captured the Hyksos capital in the Nile Delta, effectively ending Hyksos rule in Egypt and inaugurating the New Kingdom.
  • E. Nubian campaign of Ramesses II
    The Nubian campaign of Ramesses II was a military expedition by the Egyptian pharaoh to assert control and display royal power over Nubia, commemorated in temples and monuments such as those at Derr.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Egyptian conquest of Syria
Target entity description: The Egyptian conquest of Syria was a series of early 19th-century military campaigns led by Muhammad Ali’s forces that extended Egyptian influence over much of the Levant at the expense of the weakening Ottoman Empire.
  • A. Assyrian conquest of Egypt
    The Assyrian conquest of Egypt was a series of late 7th-century BCE military campaigns in which the Neo-Assyrian Empire invaded, defeated, and temporarily dominated Egypt, toppling the Nubian-led 25th Dynasty.
  • B. Conquest of Egypt
    The Conquest of Egypt was the Persian king Cambyses II’s successful military campaign in 525 BCE that brought Egypt under Achaemenid rule and ended the independence of the ancient Egyptian kingdom.
  • C. Conquest of Egypt
    The Conquest of Egypt was the 1517 Ottoman campaign that toppled the Mamluk Sultanate and brought Egypt—and with it control of the holy cities and key trade routes—under Ottoman rule.
  • D. Siege of Avaris
    The Siege of Avaris was the decisive military operation in which Ahmose I captured the Hyksos capital in the Nile Delta, effectively ending Hyksos rule in Egypt and inaugurating the New Kingdom.
  • E. Nubian campaign of Ramesses II
    The Nubian campaign of Ramesses II was a military expedition by the Egyptian pharaoh to assert control and display royal power over Nubia, commemorated in temples and monuments such as those at Derr.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0c4618bec8190bcb0feb74568cbb1 completed April 16, 2026, 11:13 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69eeeb5e45b48190a52346f6484c6f84 completed April 27, 2026, 4:51 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 6:31 p.m.