Triple
T2158075
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ware |
E47937
|
entity |
| Predicate | partyTo |
P1790
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Ware v. Hylton |
E8364
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Ware v. Hylton | Statement: [Ware, partyTo, Ware v. Hylton]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Ware v. Hylton Context triple: [Ware, partyTo, Ware v. Hylton]
-
A.
Ware v. Hylton
chosen
Ware v. Hylton was a 1796 U.S. Supreme Court case that held federal treaties override conflicting state laws, helping to establish the authority of the national government under the Constitution.
-
B.
Hylton v. United States
Hylton v. United States was an 1796 U.S. Supreme Court case that is historically significant as one of the Court’s earliest exercises of judicial review in upholding a federal tax on carriages.
-
C.
Ray v. Blair
Ray v. Blair is a 1952 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld a state's authority to require presidential electors to pledge support for their party's nominees as a condition of appointment.
-
D.
Henry v. Hodges
Henry v. Hodges is a federal court case challenging state bans on same-sex marriage, decided alongside other landmark marriage equality cases prior to Obergefell v. Hodges.
-
E.
Boynton v. Virginia
Boynton v. Virginia was a 1960 U.S. Supreme Court decision that extended federal prohibitions against racial discrimination in interstate bus terminals, helping lay the legal groundwork for the Freedom Rides.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a88a1d1fd8819088b34990d69a712f |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abbe68fe0c8190beb5db003738a6e5 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:58 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69ae58e796e88190a8d86979c7ff952f |
completed | March 9, 2026, 5:21 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:44 p.m.