Triple

T21543349
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Mendota City Council E531549 entity
Predicate hasJurisdiction P285 FINISHED
Object City of Mendota NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: City of Mendota | Statement: [Mendota City Council, hasJurisdiction, City of Mendota]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: City of Mendota
Context triple: [Mendota City Council, hasJurisdiction, City of Mendota]
  • A. City of Mendota chosen
    The City of Mendota is a small agricultural community in California’s San Joaquin Valley known for its farming economy and proximity to regional water features and wildlife areas.
  • B. City of Le Mars
    The City of Le Mars is a municipal government in Iowa known for overseeing local services and public safety agencies within its community.
  • C. Mendon
    Mendon is a small town in central Vermont known for its rural character and proximity to the Green Mountains.
  • D. Mendon
    Mendon is a small city in northern Utah known for its rural character and location within the Cache Valley.
  • E. City of Sheldon
    The City of Sheldon is a municipal government that administers local services and public institutions for the community of Sheldon.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0c45f17148190949c330ab9c27706 completed April 16, 2026, 11:13 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69eeb58d66ec8190b654a46932c841d3 completed April 27, 2026, 1:02 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 6:28 p.m.