Triple

T2152186
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject PSEG Power E47803 entity
Predicate affiliateOfType P36271 FINISHED
Object regulated utility affiliate LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: regulated utility affiliate | Statement: [PSEG Power, affiliateOfType, regulated utility affiliate]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: affiliateOfType
Context triple: [PSEG Power, affiliateOfType, regulated utility affiliate]
  • A. hasAffiliate
    Indicates that one entity is formally associated with another as an affiliate, typically through a partnership, membership, or subordinate organizational relationship.
  • B. associationStatus
    Indicates the current state or condition of an established association or relationship between entities.
  • C. affiliateLeague
    Indicates that one sports organization or team is formally associated with and operates under the umbrella or partnership of a particular league.
  • D. organizationAssociatedWith
    Indicates that there is a formal or recognized connection or affiliation between an organization and another entity.
  • E. isAssociatedWith
    Indicates that there exists a connection, relationship, or involvement between two entities without specifying its exact nature.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a88a1d1fd8819088b34990d69a712f completed March 4, 2026, 7:38 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abbe48ad148190a7d6cc88fd38a660 completed March 7, 2026, 5:57 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69abbd9a60648190b20b116be5c7ad98 completed March 7, 2026, 5:54 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69abbe4252688190944491a450383450 completed March 7, 2026, 5:57 a.m.
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:44 p.m.