Triple
T2150155
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | William Tyndale |
E47159
|
entity |
| Predicate | doctrineOrTheory |
P16583
|
FINISHED |
| Object | sola scriptura |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: sola scriptura | Statement: [William Tyndale, doctrineOrTheory, sola scriptura]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: doctrineOrTheory Context triple: [William Tyndale, doctrineOrTheory, sola scriptura]
-
A.
doctrineExplainedBy
Indicates that an explanation or interpretation is provided for a particular doctrine by a specified source or agent.
-
B.
theoreticalTradition
chosen
Indicates that one entity belongs to, is framed within, or is analyzed according to the theoretical tradition represented by the other entity.
-
C.
appliedDoctrine
Indicates that a particular doctrine, principle, or rule has been put into practice or used in interpreting or deciding a specific case, situation, or context.
-
D.
doctrineClassification
Indicates how a particular doctrine is categorized or classified within a defined system of doctrinal types.
-
E.
developedDoctrine
Indicates that one entity created, formulated, or significantly advanced a particular doctrine or set of principles.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a88a1933e0819094f18426ed74180f |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abbe45dbf481909c0da056a1a99ece |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:57 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abbd9a60648190b20b116be5c7ad98 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:54 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:44 p.m.