Triple
T21494068
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Beal conjecture |
E530308
|
entity |
| Predicate | relatedTo |
P37
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Catalan’s conjecture |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Catalan’s conjecture | Statement: [Beal conjecture, relatedTo, Catalan’s conjecture]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Catalan’s conjecture Context triple: [Beal conjecture, relatedTo, Catalan’s conjecture]
-
A.
Pillai’s conjecture
Pillai’s conjecture is an unproven statement in number theory asserting that the difference between perfect powers takes each positive integer value only finitely many times.
-
B.
Erdős–Moser equation
The Erdős–Moser equation is a famous unsolved Diophantine equation in number theory that asks whether 1^k + 2^k + ... + (m−1)^k = m^k has any integer solutions beyond the trivial case (k, m) = (1, 2).
-
C.
Fermat's theorem on sums of two squares
Fermat's theorem on sums of two squares is a result in number theory stating exactly which prime numbers (and, more generally, which integers) can be expressed as the sum of two perfect squares.
-
D.
Fermat polygonal number theorem
The Fermat polygonal number theorem is a result in number theory stating that every positive integer can be expressed as a sum of a fixed number of polygonal numbers of a given order.
-
E.
Lebesgue–Nagell equation
The Lebesgue–Nagell equation is a Diophantine equation of the form \(x^2 + D = y^n\) (with fixed integers \(D\) and \(n \ge 3\)) studied in number theory for its finite and often explicitly determinable set of integer solutions.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Catalan’s conjecture Target entity description: Catalan’s conjecture is a number theory statement, now proven as Mihăilescu’s theorem, asserting that 8 and 9 are the only consecutive perfect powers among the positive integers.
-
A.
Pillai’s conjecture
Pillai’s conjecture is an unproven statement in number theory asserting that the difference between perfect powers takes each positive integer value only finitely many times.
-
B.
Erdős–Moser equation
The Erdős–Moser equation is a famous unsolved Diophantine equation in number theory that asks whether 1^k + 2^k + ... + (m−1)^k = m^k has any integer solutions beyond the trivial case (k, m) = (1, 2).
-
C.
Fermat's theorem on sums of two squares
Fermat's theorem on sums of two squares is a result in number theory stating exactly which prime numbers (and, more generally, which integers) can be expressed as the sum of two perfect squares.
-
D.
Fermat polygonal number theorem
The Fermat polygonal number theorem is a result in number theory stating that every positive integer can be expressed as a sum of a fixed number of polygonal numbers of a given order.
-
E.
Lebesgue–Nagell equation
The Lebesgue–Nagell equation is a Diophantine equation of the form \(x^2 + D = y^n\) (with fixed integers \(D\) and \(n \ge 3\)) studied in number theory for its finite and often explicitly determinable set of integer solutions.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0c45bd15481909fba5910765cdda2 |
completed | April 16, 2026, 11:13 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e9ea567244819091863350fedae3ae |
completed | April 23, 2026, 9:45 a.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 6:23 p.m.