Triple
T21481607
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Nora Charles |
E530005
|
entity |
| Predicate | relationshipToNickCharles |
P144522
|
FINISHED |
| Object | crime-solving partner |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: crime-solving partner | Statement: [Nora Charles, relationshipToNickCharles, crime-solving partner]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relationshipToNickCharles Context triple: [Nora Charles, relationshipToNickCharles, crime-solving partner]
-
A.
relationshipToBertieWooster
Indicates the specific type of personal or social relationship an entity has with Bertie Wooster.
-
B.
relationshipTypeWithBertieWooster
Indicates the specific nature or category of relationship an entity has with Bertie Wooster.
-
C.
relationshipToLucyHoneychurch
Indicates the specific type of relationship or connection an entity has to Lucy Honeychurch.
-
D.
relationshipToBaudelaires
Indicates the type of personal or familial connection an entity has to the Baudelaires.
-
E.
relationshipToCatherine
Indicates the specific familial, social, or interpersonal connection that one entity has to the person named Catherine.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e0c45acc3881908e38d3f28964152b |
completed | April 16, 2026, 11:13 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e9ea338f988190a3044f8d02a567fe |
completed | April 23, 2026, 9:45 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e631ec1d048190b6da97da8222e413 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 2:02 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e6386c5a4481909c37f7de7e9fc025 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 2:30 p.m. |
Created at: April 16, 2026, 6:21 p.m.