Triple

T21473262
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Papuan Tip and North New Guinea contact area E529785 entity
Predicate hasTypeOfLanguages P45585 FINISHED
Object Oceanic LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Oceanic | Statement: [Papuan Tip and North New Guinea contact area, hasTypeOfLanguages, Oceanic]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasTypeOfLanguages
Context triple: [Papuan Tip and North New Guinea contact area, hasTypeOfLanguages, Oceanic]
  • A. hasLanguageType chosen
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a particular type or category of language (e.g., spoken, written, programming, sign).
  • B. hasLanguages
    Indicates that an entity is associated with one or more languages it uses, supports, or is expressed in.
  • C. hasLanguageOn
    Indicates that an entity uses or is associated with a particular language in a specific context, medium, or location.
  • D. hasLanguageStatus
    Indicates that an entity has a particular status or condition regarding its language use, recognition, or classification.
  • E. hasLanguageRepresentation
    Indicates that an entity is expressed, encoded, or represented using a particular natural or formal language.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0c459acb481909bb6ee452a0045c7 completed April 16, 2026, 11:13 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e9ea156dac819087c4594d022d3df6 completed April 23, 2026, 9:44 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e631ec1d048190b6da97da8222e413 completed April 20, 2026, 2:02 p.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 6:19 p.m.