Triple

T214575
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Positive Train Control E4790 entity
Predicate hasDeadline P8546 FINISHED
Object original implementation deadline 2015 LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: original implementation deadline 2015 | Statement: [Positive Train Control, hasDeadline, original implementation deadline 2015]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasDeadline
Context triple: [Positive Train Control, hasDeadline, original implementation deadline 2015]
  • A. endDate
    Indicates the point in time at which an event, state, or relationship stops being valid or comes to a conclusion.
  • B. completedIn
    Indicates that an action, process, or task was fully finished within a specified time period or duration.
  • C. concludedAt
    Indicates the point in time at which an event, process, or relationship comes to an end or is completed.
  • D. deliveredDuring
    Indicates that one entity was delivered within the time span defined by another entity or temporal interval.
  • E. dateOfSubmission
    Indicates the specific date on which something (such as a document, application, or assignment) was formally submitted.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a2575cb1dc8190a01ad332426dc339 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:47 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a25c32ae208190a03d504ef43ea659 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 3:08 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a25b509400819093a6c1a1bac861e3 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 3:04 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a25c036b54819090a101c4cbdbcff7 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 3:07 a.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:52 a.m.