Triple

T21363638
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Bergheim E526848 entity
Predicate hasBorderWith P224 FINISHED
Object Köstendorf NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Köstendorf | Statement: [Bergheim, hasBorderWith, Köstendorf]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Köstendorf
Context triple: [Bergheim, hasBorderWith, Köstendorf]
  • A. Köstendorf chosen
    Köstendorf is a small Austrian municipality in the state of Salzburg, known for its rural character and proximity to the city of Salzburg.
  • B. Krottendorf
    Krottendorf is a locality that forms part of the municipality of Thalgau in the Austrian state of Salzburg.
  • C. Fritzdorf
    Fritzdorf is a village in the municipality of Wachtberg in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany.
  • D. Siegsdorf
    Siegsdorf is a Bavarian town in southeastern Germany known for its scenic Alpine surroundings and proximity to the Chiemsee lake.
  • E. Nürensdorf
    Nürensdorf is a municipality in the canton of Zurich in northern Switzerland, situated near Zurich Airport and characterized by its semi-rural residential setting.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0b51d8a308190b09113b3b3f9bc15 completed April 16, 2026, 10:08 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e8b06cbcb481909ec9014da3b0a18a completed April 22, 2026, 11:26 a.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 5:08 p.m.