Triple

T21331334
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Austin E525906 entity
Predicate hasNotableBearer P458 FINISHED
Object John Austin NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: John Austin | Statement: [Austin, hasNotableBearer, John Austin]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: John Austin
Context triple: [Austin, hasNotableBearer, John Austin]
  • A. John Austin chosen
    John Austin was a 19th-century English legal theorist best known for developing the theory of legal positivism, which distinguishes law as it is from law as it ought to be.
  • B. John Turnell Austin
    John Turnell Austin was an American organ builder best known as the founder of the pipe organ manufacturing firm Austin Organs, Inc.
  • C. John Finnis
    John Finnis is a prominent legal philosopher best known for his work on natural law theory and his influential book "Natural Law and Natural Rights."
  • D. John C. Austin
    John C. Austin was a prominent early 20th-century American architect known for shaping the civic and cultural landscape of Los Angeles through several landmark buildings.
  • E. H. L. A. Hart
    H. L. A. Hart was a leading 20th-century legal philosopher whose work, especially in "The Concept of Law," reshaped analytic jurisprudence and debates over legal positivism.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e0b51b90788190a4dd823d962626da completed April 16, 2026, 10:08 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e7ab530a1c81909bb37c2a3407d9e6 completed April 21, 2026, 4:52 p.m.
Created at: April 16, 2026, 4:42 p.m.