Triple
T2132020
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Polish Peasant Party (independent wing) |
E46561
|
entity |
| Predicate | typeOfOpposition |
P35001
|
FINISHED |
| Object | legal opposition |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: legal opposition | Statement: [Polish Peasant Party (independent wing), typeOfOpposition, legal opposition]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typeOfOpposition Context triple: [Polish Peasant Party (independent wing), typeOfOpposition, legal opposition]
-
A.
opposedBy
Indicates that one entity actively resists, disagrees with, or works against the actions, views, or position of another entity.
-
B.
opposedQualityTo
Indicates that one quality stands in direct opposition or contrast to another quality.
-
C.
antagonistOf
Indicates a relationship where one entity actively opposes, conflicts with, or serves as an adversary to another.
-
D.
opposingForce
Indicates a relationship where one entity actively resists, counters, or works against the actions, goals, or influence of another entity.
-
E.
opposesPartyType
Indicates that one party or entity is in opposition to, or acts against the interests or positions of, a particular type or category of party.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a88a1626548190ae59a5028c3baa8e |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abbb7b13ac819094d43159fff984cf |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:45 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abb7bf56e481909b0f497d238451cc |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:29 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69abb860a51c8190b4ae3bb1cedc0fa0 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:32 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:44 p.m.